The news that the terrorist group, Boko
Haram, has been “effectively” defeated was as satisfying as watching a
convoluted drama resolved with a deux ex machina turn in the plot. The
inchoate resolution evokes past cases of similar premature announcements
of Boko Haram’s defeat. If the Nigerian authorities’ history on Boko
Haram is anything to go by, this announcement is a mere cliff-hanger;
more episodes are coming.
In the past weeks, the Army has suffered
major losses in the Boko Haram war. This year alone, there have been
reports of missing troops and deaths of gallant soldiers at
battlefronts. Some of the reports were aggressively denied by relevant
authorities and further discussions about them deflected. Add to their
credibility issues the humiliation the Army suffered when a video made
rounds on social media purportedly showing fighting soldiers begging for
food and water. Then, suddenly, the war is over? This calls for
circumspection. Even more bizarre is the avalanche of congratulatory
messages being showered on President Muhammadu Buhari by various
backslappers.
As a Nigerian who has grieved over the
15,000 plus deaths, two million IDPs and other instances of pain Boko
Haram has caused, I should be rejoicing that the end has come for the
manic marauders. However, as also a Nigerian who has witnessed how the
war on Boko Haram has unconscionably transformed into a self-sustaining
military-political industrial complex and propaganda spinner, I am
rather restrained from celebrating what may turn out to be another
George Bush’s “mission accomplished” pyrrhic victory. Nigeria has
travelled this road many times and the macabre outcome has been more
acts of violence wreaked on defenceless citizens who were rushed to
their supposedly secure community to meet the schedule drawn up for
defeating Boko Haram. This time round, politicians cannot seem to
reiterate enough that Buhari p romised to end Boko Haram by end of 2016
and he delivered on his promise. I am not sure the necessity of the
haste for “end of year present” as lives lost cannot be replaced.
Hopefully, this is not another All Progressives Congress propaganda.
Just a year ago, that the same
government announced that Boko Haram had been “technically defeated.”
Buhari had boasted that they would defeat Boko Haram by end of 2015 and
with the calendar about to prove them wrong, they declared Boko Haram
defeated. Within 48 hours, the group responded with a deadly attack in
Adamawa and Borno states that claimed at least 50 lives. A shamed Lai
Muhammed, Minister of Information and Culture, quickly announced that
despite the fresh attacks the group had in fact atrophied, that they had
been deprived of their territory, and they lacked any wherewithal to
carry out their agenda of establishing an Islamic state. The worst they
could do, he said, was attack “soft targets,” a phrasing that minimises
the reality of the suffering of those being decimated by terrorist
activities.
The Boko Haram defeat announcement feels
like déjà vu except that the language has been changed from
“technically defeated” to “effectively defeated.” For a war that has
taken seven years, is this how it all ends? Why not address the nation
properly instead of pushing a terse press release and later sending an
aide to “clarify” the details? For instance, what does this land
reclamation truly mean in the battle against Boko Haram? Shortly before
Dr. Goodluck Jonathan’s government was voted out, the Army also
conducted operations that retrieved territories from Boko Haram but the
war has raged on. That means a loss of spatial territory by the
terrorists does not automatically translate into a loss of ideological
grounds as well. We also know that Boko Haram has extended its
operational tentacles into neighbouring countries like Chad and Niger
Republic from where they crisscross into Nigeria to unleash deadly
violence. What does this victory mean for the border crossers?
We should also know how the Operation Lafiya Dole
that ended in the Army occupation of Boko Haram was conducted. What
exactly happened? The stories being bandied around in the media are full
of “dem say, dem say” reports revealed by faceless figures, why is the
Army not giving a reliable account of what went down in Sambisa forest?
“They” said they arrested terrorists. How many of them and who were
they? There was another report of a “white” man found in Sambisa forest
but up till now, there has been no name or picture of him released. Who
is he? I acknowledge that the Army cannot release every piece of
information yet but they cannot also be merely sketchy and expect us to
accept their words as verity.
For years, it has been insinuated that
Abubakar Shekau- whose ancestry remains a mystery – lives in Sambisa.
Now that the terrorists’ Camp Zero has fallen, where are he and his
lieutenants? How many of them were arrested? What is Nigeria’s plan for
justice for them?
After Osama bin Laden had been killed,
we were at least allowed to see his abode and also learnt how he had
managed to hide from the United States’ panoptical lens for years. So,
what of Shekau’s abode and what can the items retrieved from the camp
tell us about the way he lived? No, I am not merely asking these simply
because I am a voyeur, I think the public deserves to know considering
that we have been deceived about his death at least twice. If Shekau
truly died this time, how did they verify his final death? Do they have
his DNA stored to crossmatch with whomever they killed? The Nigerian
Army has credibility issues where Boko Haram victories are concerned and
merely issuing press release is not going to fly. The Nigerian Army –
for too long, a coup-making propaganda machine – has not been
straightforward.
We were told that a Boko Haram terrorist
was arrested in Ikorodu, Lagos, and that Nigerians should watch out for
more of them trying to mingle with civilian population. Did he escape
from Sambisa Forest and somehow ended up in Lagos within 48 hours of
Camp Zero being breached? Lai Mohammed, the information minister, said
if Nigerians “see something” they should “say something.” The problem
with his vague charge is that he is more or less asking Nigerians to
chase phantoms on his behalf. How do we know who Boko Haram members are
when they have not provided identifying information that can help our
sense of vigilance? Who and what are we to look out for? We see
something every day but how are we supposed to know when to say
something?
Nigerians will also like to know what
the recapture of Sambisa Forest means going forward? Aside from the
Chief of Army Staff, Lt. Gen. Tukur Buratai, and his future plans of
despoiling the nature reserve, there should be other discussions of how
Boko Haram defeat will impact the humungous sums earmarked for militancy
and insurgency in the 2017 budget. What does the Nigerian Army’s
“effective victory” mean to the IDPs who have lost their homes and are
now being raped in almost every imaginable way by members of the present
administration?
With similar predators in high places,
will the IDPs go home or their predicament remains a money-making source
for “Ogas at the top”? These are a few of the questions that are on my
mind for now as regards the Sambisa re-occupation. I am curious to know
how they can claim to have won such a major battle, an entire terrorist
enclave pillaged, and we are required to just believe without proof even
though the same government has been lying to us for two years? They owe
us more than celebratory press releases; we need both explanations and
projections into what a post-Boko Haram Nigeria would look like.
0 comments:
Post a Comment