Wednesday, 12 October 2016

Why AGF shuns EFCC, sends judges’ cases to DSS

The Federal Ministry of Justice decided to forward petitions against judges bordering on alleged corrupt acts to the Department of State Services when the ministry discovered that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission failed to act on previous petitions as expected, The PUNCH learnt on Wednesday.

It was gathered that some human rights groups forwarded petitions to the Federal Ministry of Justice when the anti-graft agency failed to investigate and prosecute the judges.

 

Investigations also showed that the relationship between the EFCC and the Ministry of Justice had been frosty.

It was gathered that the problem between the agencies was caused by the inability of the anti-graft agency to speedily investigate some of the cases forwarded to it by the ministry.

The government source, who confided in The PUNCH, cited a petition on the withdrawal of over N11bn from the Rivers State Government’s account between October, 2015, and February, 2016.

According to an exclusive report by The PUNCH on June 24, the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr. Abubakar Malami, had, in March, 2016, directed the EFCC to investigate the withdrawal, which the ministry described as suspicious.

“From all indications, because of the EFCC’s seeming inaction on some of these cases, the ministry of justice has now resorted to forwarding the petitions to the DSS.  Obviously the EFCC is not happy with this,” the source stated.

The relationship between the ministry and the anti-graft agency has actually not been cordial since President Muhammadu Buhari sent the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Bill, 2016, to the National Assembly through the AGF earlier this year.

The EFCC definitely sees nothing good about the law, though it acknowledges that the extant Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (amended in 2012) needs to be amended again.

On the new law, the EFCC catalogued what it considered the many flaws of the new bill in a position paper, which it submitted to the National Assembly.

It pointed out in the paper, which was obtained by one of our correspondents, that among others, “it is not advisable to pass the bill into law.”

The EFCC maintained that the passage of the bill into law would be inimical to Nigeria’s standing in the next round of mutual evaluation of the nation’s Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Financing of Terrorism by the relevant international bodies.

It is obvious from the issues raised by the commission that it is apprehensive that the bill seeks to whittle down some its powers under the EFCC Act.The PUNCH gathered on Wednesday that the EFCC was bitter because it was already investigating some of the judges, who were arrested by the DSS on Friday and Saturday.

The DSS had, in what it called a sting operation, arrested Sylvester Ngwuta and Inyang Okoro, both of the Supreme Court;  the suspended Presiding Justice of the Court of Appeal, Ilorin Division, Justice Mohammed Tsamiya; Justice Kabiru Auta of the Kano State High Court and Justice Adeniyi Ademola of the Federal High Court, Abuja.

Others arrested were a former Chief Judge of Enugu State, Justice I. A. Umezulike, and Muazu Pindiga of the Federal High Court, Gombe Division.

It was also learnt the rivalry between the two agencies came to a head when the EFCC allegedly opposed the takeover of the investigations of some petitions against some judges, which it had already worked on.

A top government source, who confided in The PUNCH, said the EFCC was also not favourably disposed to investigating some judges, who had assisted in the speedy trial of graft cases instituted by the commission.

The source stated, “The point of disagreement came from the investigation into the petitions. While the EFCC thought that the DSS should steer clear of the petitions because it had already worked on them, the service and the Federal Ministry of Justice insisted that the commission was slow in its investigations.

A source in the EFCC explained that if not for the rivalry, the DSS should have involved the commission in the investigation into the graft allegations against the judges.

He stated that the anti-graft commission was of the view that the DSS disrupted ongoing investigations being carried out by it into the alleged corrupt practices by some judges.

According to him, the EFCC has been carrying out discreet investigations into the activities of three judges, which were said to be jeopardised by the raids conducted by the DSS.

“It is a DSS operation. The EFCC is not involved. The raids carried out on the judges’ residents have affected our ongoing investigation into the activities of some of the judges.

“What this has done is that they have alerted those suspected judges. With what they have done, they have alerted them to be careful,” the source in the commission told The PUNCH on Wednesday.

We earlier submitted petitions against judges to EFCC –CSNAC

The Chairman of the Civil Society Network Against Corruption, Mr. Olanrewaju Suraju, confirmed to one of our correspondents that his petitions against some of the judges were earlier sent to the EFCC.

“We sent the petitions to the EFCC and in fact, the anti-graft agency commenced investigation.

“They found evidence against one or two of the judges, but it was obvious that they could not proceed against the suspected judges,” he said without explanations.

It was gathered that the group as well as Human and Environmental Development Agenda Resource Centre had initially sent some of the petitions against the judges to the NJC and the EFCC.

DSS free to carry out its operations, say Police

On the role of the police in the raids, the Force Public Relations Officer, Donald Awunah, in an interview with one of our correspondents, said though the police and the DSS engaged in inter-agency collaboration, the arrest of the judges was not a joint operation.

Awunah said the DSS had the right to carry out its operations without involving the police.

“You cannot say the non-involvement of the police in the operation by the DSS amounted to lack of confidence in the Force. We engaged in inter-service collaboration from time to time, but the DSS is free to carry out its own operation alone without involving us,” he stated.

Corruption is threatening our internal security –Sagay

When The PUNCH contacted the Chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption, Prof. Itse Sagay (SAN), he faulted the argument that the DSS acted outside its statutory mandate by arresting some judges when its operatives raided their houses.

He described the argument canvassed against the DSS operation as puerile.

According to Sagay, the allegations of bribe-taking, levelled against some judges, especially when they have to do with election cases, can cause a breach of security which falls within the mandate of the DSS.

He said, “That is a very puerile interpretation of the mandate of the DSS. The DSS is established to maintain internal security through intelligence operations.

“I think it’s got to a stage where judicial corruption was beginning to threaten internal security in the sense that if you look at the case of elections, for example, taking bribes and declaring somebody, who lost an election or who did not win an election, as the winner, particularly, those who first bribed the Independent National Electoral Commission, then engaged in killing people and destroying properties in order to get there.

“If such people’s elections are upheld, that threatens internal security because the other party, knowing that the party that was declared winner did not win the election or that there was no election, and that the party got there by a combination of bloody combat and bribery of the judiciary, will also tend to resort to force of arms and then you can have a disintegration of the society.

“So when bribery gets out of hand and the consequences are becoming devastating, it can create conflict within the society and that, in my view, can result in a breach of security.”

DSS has no business with corruption matters –Ozekhome

But Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN) said the DSS had no business with corruption matters.

Ozekhome stated, “Emphasise it to them (the Federal Government) that provisions of Sections 10, 11, 12, 13, 186, 187 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act  which some have incredibly argued presumably allow unarmed and non-resistant citizens’ homes to be broken into to be searched at any time of the day or night, including weekend and public holidays, constitute a violent violation of sections 34, 35, 36 and 37 of the 1999 constitution and are accordingly null and void by virtue of sections 1 (1) and 1 (3) of the same constitution.

According to him, search warrants validly issued by a court of competent jurisdiction are only executed between 6am and 6pm.

He added, “Under our laws, the DSS is concerned with matters of internal security. It has no business whatsoever with corruption matters, which are the exclusive preserve of the EFCC, the ICPC and the police.”

Also, Chief Edward Ashiekaa (SAN), said from the enabling Act creating DSS, it  did  not have the power to prosecute.

“Some people keep making references to FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) of the United States, but the FBI only investigates and hands over to the Department of Justice for prosecution,” he said.

Efforts to get the reaction of the DSS did not succeed as it had yet to get a spokesman.

 CSNAC’s petitions received our attention based on merit –EFCC

The Head of Media and Publicity of the EFCC, Mr. Wilson Uwujaren, said while he did not know the particular judges referred to by the CSNAC, petitions received from the group on several sectors were duly treated.

He said, “I don’t know some of the judges under reference. But suffice it to say that the commission has over the years received petitions from CSNAC covering several sectors and issues.

“All received attention based on merit as every petition to the commission do.”

Alleged Corruption: DSS to arraign seven judges next week

Meanwhile, the DSS will next week arraign seven judges it arrested across the country on Friday and Saturday last week.

A top DSS source, who confided in The PUNCH, explained that the service was almost through with the investigations into the allegations against the judges, adding that it was waiting for the National Judicial Council to take actions against them.

He stated, “The ongoing investigation is not supposed to go beyond this week. We have written to the NJC about what has happened and we expect the NJC to take some decisions about the affected judges this week.

“Once that is done, hopefully by next week or thereabouts, we should arraign them in court. For now, more facts in the form of petitions are trickling in about the judges.”

He further stated that it was its statutory responsibility to investigate painstakingly every complaint against the judges, adding that some victims had even indicated their readiness to testify in court.

The source also said that as part of the investigations, it had gone through the asset declaration forms the judges submitted to the Code of Conduct Bureau.

“We discovered a judge filling three different forms with different information either in terms of assets declared or even personal information like age. Imagine one judge filling three different forms with different information just to deceive. Just as I said, we will do a thorough job.’’

The PUNCH also learnt on Wednesday that the DSS seized the telephones of the seven judges under investigation for corruption.

A security source, who spoke with one of our correspondents on condition of anonymity, said the call logs of the affected judges were being analysed.

A top security source said the telephones of the judges were being analysed to know whether they had what was described as “illicit communication” with politicians.

The source said, “We have seized their telephones and we have started analysing everything.

“Apart from that, we are checking their call logs and also checking the calls that had been coming in since Saturday.”

It was also gathered that the DSS had asked all the affected judges to be reporting at its headquarters, otherwise known as ‘Yellow House’ every day.

Protesters storm Federal High Court, demand judges’ prosecution

A group of protesters, under the aegis of Human Rights and Anti-Corruption Coalition, stormed the premises of the Federal High Court on Oyinkan Abayomi Drive, Ikoyi, on Wednesday, demanding the prosecution of the seven judges arrested over the weekend for alleged corruption.

Speaking through their leader, Desmond Abiona, the protesters expressed their solidarity with the DSS for arresting the judges and condemned those who termed the DSS action as an attack on the judiciary.

Abiona alleged that the arrested judges had already sponsored a group of protesters to march against the DSS and launch cyberspace war, calling on the public to watch out for them.

He stated that the DSS had exposed the endemic rot in the judiciary, which had eroded the gains of Nigeria’s democracy.

Abiona said he and his colleagues were disappointed that members of the public, who were victims of corruption, were still being fooled to believe that the action of the DSS was an attack on the judiciary.

He said, “We are sad to discover that the democracy we thought we had for almost two decades was a farce – the judiciary that is a crucial arm of government, that should be the last recourse of the common man is a bigger problem than what we had hoped it would solve for us.”

Inculcating smartphones into business


Create a visual checklist for your employees

Are your employees sloughing off or ignoring your daily checklists? Maybe they are visual learners and cannot appreciate what an awesome checklist you have created. Send them the lists with visuals of what the end result of each task should be.

Create instant testimonials

Got a super happy customer that just made a purchase? Ask them if you could take a picture or video of them in their excited state.

Have a face-to-face with your employees

Need to have a talk with one of your employees but you are both in different cities or countries? Instead of a text message, why not use your phone to host a video call? Mobile apps like Skype and Google Hangouts make it easy (and free) to have a quick video conference with someone.

Document your belongings before you travel

Have you had your luggage take an unexpected trip at the airport? Before you head out, take a few minutes to snap pictures of your luggage, and it is unbroken contents. This will help if you need to produce an inventory at some point.

Take pictures of your business cards

Got too many business cards floating around your desk, glove compartment and wallet? Why not use your mobile camera to snap and store them digitally? Use an app like like CamCard to scan a digital version of a business card and add detailed notes for a later follow up.

Send product images instantly to potential customers

Got a customer calling or emailing you asking about a new product? Take a snapshot of it with your camera and email them a visual while you are still on the phone to increase your chances of making an instant sale.



How you can use smartphones for presentations

 

Here are 10 ways you can incorporate smartphone users into your presentation and become the topic of conversation online and off.

Encourage and reward people for using their smartphones

At Cause Marketing Forum’s annual conference in Chicago in June this year, someone asked people to use their smartphones. To show them how serious he was, he offered a copy of a book and a $100 gift card of donorschoose.org <http://donorschoose.org> to the person that mentioned him the most on their Twitter and Facebook pages.

Give your presentation a hashtag

 At the CMF, the person also asked people to use the conference, hashtag#CMF12, and the hashtag for his presentation, #CMLight, as he was speaking on ‘The Lighter Side of Cause Marketing’. That way they could see and interact with other people that were talking about his speech. His audience didn’t have to remember those hashtags as he included them at the bottom of every slide.

Give them suggested tweets

Between slides he gave his audience clever and funny things to tweet and Facebook about him: “That @JoeWaters is wicked funny… good looking too! #cmf12 #cmlight.” He also encouraged people to rant and rave about his Boston accent and love for the Boston Red Sox.

Give people your Twitter handle

This was a great way to answer people’s questions during and after his presentation. He also picked up a lot of new followers!

Talk about things that people can check out on their phones

He always mentioned his blog <http://selfishgiving.com/> and Pinterest boards <http://pinterest.com/joewaters/>, which are both optimised for mobile devices. If people are not listening to him, maybe they wil find something more useful on something else of his. At least they are still being engaged by him instead of ‘Angry Birds’.

Poll your audience via text

He has seen this a lot at conferences, most recently at the Cause Marketing Forum where the facilitators used mGive <http://mgive.com/>. The speaker asks a question and the audience can text their answers. The best part is that you can see the results live and instantaneously on the screen.

Tell people to ‘write this down’

Encourage listeners to use their phones and tablets as notepads to jot down those nuggets in your speech that they need to remember.

Encourage people to e-mail you for more information

Information Technology-savvy people love to do this once or twice during a presentation. They pick a juicy topic and ask people to email them for more details. So they won’t forget, they told them to do it right now. By the way, they do not give them a sales pitch. This is something they want and it is free.

Upload your presentation to slideshare

That way listeners can follow along on their smartphones and review past slides or jump ahead in the presentation. You may be thinking, ‘Why would I want to give my audience an excuse to tune you out?’ There is a good chance they will anyway. At least they are looking at your presentation and not updating their Facebook page.

This last tip is yours

Have you ever engaged smartphone users in a presentation? If so, how? Will you use some of these tips in your next presentation?

It is funny that when researching this topic, one found a lot of advice on getting people to turn off their phones during a speech. One tip was to stand near the offender to shame him into submission. Sorry, but some people think that ship has sailed. Smartphones and mobile technology are an inescapable part of our lives and we as speakers need to adapt or risk being unheard.

Unholy alliance between government and commercial banks

The discussion of the nation’s economy is nearly always done in jargon that goes completely over the heads of most Nigerians including unfortunately, its political leadership.  The proliferation of terminologies such as “stagflation”, “cost-push inflation” and “recession” in the current discussion of the economic hardship being suffered by Nigerians is no exception.  The Minister of Budget and National Planning, Udoma Udo-Udoma, the Minister of Finance, Kemi Adeosun, and the Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Godwin Emefiele, may know what they mean by these terms.  Some of the solutions they are proposing may even have some merit, but they fail to address the fundamental iniquity of the Nigerian economy, namely that most of the citizens and small businesses of this country are being denied access to bank loans.  If this is not corrected, no amount of economic jargons or palliative measures will produce any lasting cure for an injustice that has become chronic.
There seems to be an unholy codependent collusion between Nigeria’s commercial banks and the principal consumers of their bank loans, specifically our governments.  The CBN Governor recently articulated how this unholy alliance operates:
“And I will give you an example.  Is it fair that the government allows ministries and agencies to release its money to the banks and those banks do not pay any interest to the government?  At best they pay one or two per cent but at the same time when government wants to borrow by selling Treasury bills, government goes back to these banks and these banks use the liquidity that the government gave through ministries and pass back to the Federal Government at 12, 13 or 14 per cent.”

Of course, this did not begin with the Buhari administration.  In fact, it is the government that has been courageous enough to impose the Treasury Single Account in an attempt to check the abuse.  Although it is clear that the collusion between commercial banks and Nigeria’s government has perennially starved the economy of investment and consumer loans, previous administrations have looked the other way.  It is no wonder that banks would rather lend to an apparently very dumb government at the expense of the Nigerian economy.
Over the years, the over-reliance of our commercial banks on government’s deposits and borrowing has tended to limit – if not completely crowd out – any appetite on the part of commercial banks for consumption and investment loans to most citizens.  The banks could not care less about extending such loans to Nigerians because the profits and safety of high-yielding government debts are so much more attractive.  And different administrations in Nigeria, all the way up to the Jonathan era and beyond, have pretended and continue to pretend that this unstated collusion against the real economy does not exist.  But it does.
It involves denying many businesses and consumers credit through a liquidity squeeze that is marked by rates of interest that are almost perpetually high.  Instead, the banks provide money to the government to use, steal or waste by stacking cash into Treasury bills at dumbfoundingly high yields that make many bankers millionaires and billionaires without breaking a commensurate sweat.  Under this profane symbiosis, the banks and the government win.  The economy and the people lose.
This connivance between government and commercial banks can single-handedly shrink economic growth and may have contributed to Nigeria’s negative growth over the past two consecutive quarters (current recession) and the high unemployment that we continue to suffer.  Small businesses are the major victims of high interest rates, yet the world over; small businesses are recognised as the main key to job creation.
That’s why the Minister of Finance was right to make her recent distress call for the reduction of interest rates.  Such a reduction would encourage consumers to borrow money from banks with which to buy goods and services from businesses.  That is what obtains in a normal economy that has not been booby-trapped by what I hereby christen “GABIA”: Government and Bankers Iniquitous Alliance.
Increasing economic growth and employment of citizens is certainly part of the macroeconomic objectives of the Buhari administration, but it is one that can only be achieved when there is money in the pockets of citizens to buy the things they need.  That is why the minister had to call for interest rate reduction, but if there is any doubt about the extent to which GABIA is entrenched, it should be erased by the lukewarm – and even dismissive – response to her call by some pundits, a situation which points to a certain affection for GABIA.
It is true that the increasing levels of inflation in this period of recession have further complicated a situation for which the textbook response is to raise rather than lower interest rates.  Many analysts tend to parrot this as the only possible response to our present situation.
But suppose we step out of the box to ask whether our present condition really is in that same text book?  And whether what we are facing is cost-push inflation – as the administration claims, or inflation caused by increases in money as the data seems to suggest?  A bit of economic theorisation is in order.
Some economists have argued for donkey’s years that most rises in prices are due to rapid increases in money supply.  In fact, the CBN’s own analysis confirms that this is the case in Nigeria.  Only last year, an empirical, rigorous and non-evangelical CBN Working Paper entitled, “Monetary Growth and Inflation Dynamics in Nigeria”, confirmed a direct relationship between the growth in money supply and inflation in Nigeria.  This suggests that inflation can be managed through the manipulation of money supply, meaning that the inordinate fear that we are in a killer stagflation (a combination of recession and inflation) is tenuous at best.
The truth is that our recession will not last for long because its underlying causes (including the impact of devaluation on raw material costs, and low receipts from crude oil sales) may in fact be temporary.  The International Monetary Fund has recently confirmed as much.  In its October 2016 World Economic Outlook, it forecast that the current recession in Nigeria will end in 2017, as the economy will grow by 0.6 per cent that year. Well, 2017 is just around the corner.  This is why I call our much hyped stagflation – baby stagflation,  to stress the point that it does not deserve the irksome hubbub that has consumed public commentaries.
Given that many of our citizens are in the grip of recession-induced suffering, any administration worth its salt must do whatever it takes to give them some immediate relief.  That is where the Minister of Finance seems to be coming from, and she has my full support.
Sometimes, a government has to intervene subtly – but resolutely – in the free market to protect infant industries, domestic producers, the security sector, and generally, the health and well-being of its citizens and economy.  In Nigeria, the time for such an intervention is now.  Suggesting that the interest rate be lowered is a good place to start in the fight against recession.  I therefore identify with the finance minister, with the caveat that GABIA must be caged and, hopefully, stopped.
  • Prof. Onwudiwe wrote this piece from Abuja

Perspectives on the forthcoming US election


Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump and Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton / AFP PHOTO / DESK

I have decided to write this article in view of the fact that with less than 100 days to the date of the United States of America’s presidential election on November 8, one of the prominent candidates, Mr Donald Trump of the Republican Party, had to say that it would be “a waste of time” if he lost the election. (CNNReport , August 3, 2016). As a result, the election is likely to end with a crisis of confidence if Trump loses. Such an outcome will be a disservice to democracy all over the Western world generally and the US, its avowed champion, in particular.
But what is democracy?  The ancient Greeks, as contemplative thinkers,  fashioned out in the City of Athens , a radically  people -oriented  system of government that was operative  from 508 until 322 BCE whereby  power was placed in the hands of the people (demos)  to debate among themselves, rich or poor  and decide on how they wanted to be governed by three important  Institutions in the polity as their pillars of Democracy , namely ( a) the Assembly of the Demos (b) the Council  of tested Elders  numbering 500  and (c ) the People’ s Court . The Assembly gave opportunity to all male citizens of 18 years and above, whose parents and themselves  were free citizens and not slaves to speak their minds  and exercise their vote regularly. After two centuries, the system broke down due to the inordinate excesses of demagogues  led by Demosthenes who perverted the wishes of the people.
Since the modern era, democracy has become the system of governance  in the  Western world  with variants of the system being championed  by Britain  and the United States  of America  ever since. The rest of the world has come to respect democracy defined by one of the finest presidents of the USA as “the government of the people, by the people and for the people”. Its greater workability  and better success  in lifting the innate spirit of man  to soar higher  to achieve socio-economic exploits  not only for himself but for the good of the generality of the governed  has endeared the system to its friend or foe the world over.

It is clear  from the names, Democratic Party and Republican Party , the two dominant  political parties in the USA, that  it has always been the intention  of the founding fathers  and subsequent leaders of the country that their desire was to be governed  as a “democratic republic “ as distinct from a “monarchical democracy”  that still obtains in Britain from which the US broke away in 1766. With this background, it is my intention to express  my observations, reflections and fears for the future of democracy  in the US from the prism of  an “armchair” dispassionate  observer  of what has transpired  since the campaign  for the election of the next President  of the greatest ( not  largest) democracy in the world  started  about a year ago.
 Incidentally , I also  had the opportunity  to comment  on the 2000  election between George  W. Bush  and Al Gore in the article, “One Shot in the Bush and an Ox is Gored”  published that year in The PUNCH.
For the success of democracy, most writers are agreed that there must be some minimum preconditions. Some essential Institutions must exist and function effectively to ensure a level playing field. Political parties must exist as midwives  for ushering in the modus  operandi of regulating the number of contestants, political party manifestoes  and guidelines , practical and ethical  arrangement for conduct of elections , funding of party and candidates ,  and generally satisfying the people’s expectations  and making it easy for them to make their preferred choice  of the party’s torch-bearer. There must be an overall umpire – like a state organisation and a legal court of last resort for resolution of conflicting interests and disputes. As I will indicate later, my first adverse  observation is that  imperfections  in the setting  up and weakness  in empowering  the political parties  vis – a -vis the ambitions of the political gladiators  constitute the Achilles’ heel of the American system. Maybe, this is as a result of the respect for individual freedom of choice as against the collective standpoint  as a way of American life and living .
Constitutionally, when there is a sitting President not seeking reelection, as Barack Obama in this his second term, it is provided that electioneering for the ensuing year cannot  begin earlier than 644 days  before the Election Day. Therefore, the candidates of the two major parties  entered  the race for the 2016 presidential election  as follows:- (a) Hillary Clinton: a brilliant Attorney at Law, former US Senator and who, was First Lady as wife of President Bill Clinton later vied against Obama for the Presidency in 2014 and later served as Secretary of State during his first term of office, started  her campaign  on April 12, 2015, that is 517 days to,  or one year and seven months before the Election Day. She was joined by two others in the Democratic Party list including another strong candidate, Bernie Sanders,  a serving Senator who calls himself  an independent Socialist.   ( b) Donald Trump: a reality Television star and a real estate developer, a self-declared “multibillionaire “ who was  formerly a member  of the Democratic Party, declared his  candidacy  under the platform  of the Republican Party on June 16, 2015, that is 573 days or one year and nearly five months before the election. Joined by a large motley team of contestants originally, 20  thinned down  to 16  comprising four serving/former senators, 15 serving /former governors, one businesswoman  and one businessman in total. Before the campaign matured, Trump was considered a weak candidate  but he turned the table against all odds and to the bewilderment of all. ( c) Until late July 2016, when  the candidate  of the Libertarian Party, Governor Johnson and his running mate surfaced, the contest was essentially  between Clinton  and Trump who had been officially  adopted  as candidates  of the Republican and Democratic parties respectively.
However, the electoral campaign of both candidates became some kind of hot, bitter, acrimonious and divisive  contest, described by the CNN as “election unlike any before”  for several reasons.
Both can be seen as rebels not ready to toe party lines, manifestoes (if any)  and ideals. Both tend to succumb to the dictates of the off-the-run young members of both parties and some undecided voters but opinion- moulding  or vocal community  influentials . Trump champions not only his own vision of government run as a one-man business wary of what many business entrepreneurs  of his type call “paralysis of analysis”, jumping into conclusion  without careful investigation  which may run his effort  down the ditch. On the other hand, Sanders sees himself  as championing  a movement  ( don’t call it a revolution ) towards the far -left repugnant  to a majority of Americans  except the impatient young voters  who feel left behind  by the system. Both are not party loyalists  but their campaign slogans seem to catch the fancies  of the young, impatient, undecided voters  or new voters  who seem at this point  in time and history of  the American socio-economic landscape  to be led by wrong champions. Trump is too self-opinionated to build a cohesive team and too inexplicably  dirty- rich  to successfully lead a rebellion of “ have-nots”.
However, given the challenges confronting each of the candidates  outlined above, Clinton and Trump have had to use their best endeavours  to run their campaigns without rubbishing their political parties. This means that they would try to utilise their personal qualities , resources and social and other experiences gained over the years. On doing so, it is observed that there are glaring challenges that  can mar the success of  their campaigns.  They both have clear chips over their shoulders. Clinton having  been in the public glare  directly  or indirectly  for nearly  40 years  is considered jaded by many of the young , undecided voters  and  having loyally served  Obama  lately  and so deserving  some rest  and that having  functioned as  First Lady during the Presidency of Bill Clinton is considered a surrogate of her husband or that of Obama both of whose approval  rating  in their second terms would  have qualified  them for a third innings  if the American constitution had  permitted.  In any case, she is considered  generally as an “establishment  candidate “ , too smartly knowledgeable to be tainted  by political mudslinging  or bothered by spurious  inquisitions  lined up  by the Republican Party.  On the other hand , Trump, weaker in intellectual prowess , political experience and lacking  the social polish  of Clinton right from the beginning  did not hide his aversion towards research-based  policies or what he termed “political correctness”.

Electricity consumers, AKHA lament unrealistic bills

 

Electricity consumers in Akwa Ibom State have accused the Port Harcourt Electricity Distribution Company of extortion.

The consumers alleged on Wednesday in Uyo that the PHEDC had abandoned their responsibilities to members of the public, but circulates outrageous bills to Akwa Ibom residents.

A consumer and resident of Anwa Nsa Street, Uyo, Mr. Idongesit Ekpenyong, said the idea behind the estimated billing system was the company’s calculated plan to gain at the expense of the public as any appropriate billing system would have revealed the true state of services rendered.

 

Ekpenyong alleged that after one year of total blackout owing to faulty transformer, the company, after installing a new one, sent bills covering the one-year period of blackout.

“Imagine a situation where you had no light in your area, not even a flash for one full year, and after one year they brought in bills covering the entire period of total blackout. Some flats were receiving bills of N150, 000 and single rooms N50-70,000 for the period,” he said.

Another consumer and resident of Esuene Street, Mr. Isaiah Udofia, said  PHEDC had defied every sense of responsibility and duty to members of Akwa Ibom public.

He said the company supplied powers to most streets in Uyo just within 48 hours to distribution of bills as a bait to lure the people to pay bills.

The Akwa Ibom State House of Assembly had, in response to the public outcry, criticised the power distribution company. This followed a notice of motion brought before the House by the member representing Ibesikpo Asutan State Constituency, Mr. Aniekan Uko, during its plenary, with the motion titled, ‘The unwholesome and alleged fraudulent charges on electricity consumers in Akwa Ibom State by PHEDC.’

The team leader, Public Communications, John Onyi, said consumers were charged according to the amount of energy they are supplied.

I was not flown abroad for treatment – Okowa

Governor Ifeanyi Okowa of Delta State, on Wednesday, dismissed report that he was flown abroad for medical treatment as a result of the injury he sustained in a domestic accident.

He, however, confirmed that he was involved in a domestic accident when one of the wall tiles at the Government House Asaba fell on his head while trying to wash his hands last week Wednesday.

The governor said he sustained a minor injury in the process which confirmed Tuesday’s exclusive report in The PUNCH.

 

The PUNCH had on Tuesday reported that Okowa sustained an injury on his head following a domestic accident while preparing to attend the World Teachers’ Day held in Asaba, the state capital last week Wednesday.

But the governor while speaking on media reports concerning the incident on Wednesday dismissed being flown abroad for medical treatment.

Okowa said, “The truth is that last Wednesday, I entered the washroom in my office and one of the tiles fell off from the wall and I had a minor cut on my head and I had two stitches and it was treated, and I was ok.”

He expressed surprise that the incident was blown out of proportion by a section of the social and main stream media suggesting that he collapsed and was flown abroad for medical attention.

 

Sale of two aircraft not enough

 

FACED with an economy in a tailspin and a citizenry impatient for a turnaround in their fortunes, a reluctant President Muhammadu Buhari has been forced to put up for sale two out of the 10 aircraft in the Presidential Air Fleet. On Monday, the Presidency also handed over two helicopters in the fleet to the Nigerian Air Force to aid its operations in the North-East. According to one of his aides, Garba Shehu, the decision was influenced both by the President’s election campaign promises and the need to cut down on waste.

Ordinarily, a sensible step to take, it however does not still address some pertinent questions, especially  those regarding  why it took this long for a decision to be taken on the fulfillment of a simple, straight-forward campaign promise and why only two out of a fleet of 10 are being put up for sale.

By taking 17 months to set his plan in motion, the President lost the opportunity to convince Nigerians that he is indeed different from his predecessors, who spent the country’s vast fortunes to acquire this personal comfort for themselves. Just the way he rejected plans to acquire five new armoured Mercedes Benz S-600 (V222) cars for him, because of what doing so symbolised, he could as well have done away with the aircraft as soon as he assumed office and his action would have been loudly applauded.

 

But, by delaying his move for this long, he has failed in one of his stated objectives, which is to cut costs. Already, billions of Nigeria’s hard earned money that should have been committed to other areas of need has been wasted on the maintenance of the aircraft and the upkeep of the crew. Although it is not exactly clear how much must have gone into the maintenance of the aircraft, yet an unnecessary controversy that occurred in November last year can shed some light on that.

Following a publication alleging that over N6 billion had gone into maintaining the fleet between the May 29 inauguration date of the administration and November last year, Shehu was at pains trying to explain that N2.3 billion was the amount released for the maintenance of the PAF, and not N6 billion as was alleged. Between then and now, a period of almost one year, it is expected that much more could have gone into the maintenance costs; but that is money that  could have been saved or put to better use had the Presidency acted promptly.

As the question was asked then about 10 aircraft, it will also be asked about the six: what is the Federal Government doing with six aircraft at a time when the country’s economy is in straitened circumstances? Although two of the aircraft have been given to the Air Force, that is not convincing enough. It could be safely argued that, as long as the aircraft remain with another government establishment, it is as good as belonging to the PAF, which could make use of them whenever it feels like doing so.

More importantly, the government has no business keeping more than two aircraft in its pool when the convention is that many presidents now travel with commercial flights. In a recent instance, the South African President, Jacob Zuma, travelled on a South African Airways flight to and from New York, where he attended the 71st session of the United Nations General Assembly. While expressing his “satisfaction about the excellent service and restful journey,” a South African congressman reportedly said, “President Zuma must continue to use South African Airways for his international flights, as doing so would cut unnecessary costs.”

Also, in 2012, Francoise Hollande announced, upon taking over from Nicolas Sarkozy as the president, his intention to use train for his official journeys in France and to European Union summits in Brussels, Belgium. It is important to note that Hollande was taking that decision based on the need to save money. If the president of the sixth largest economy in the world with a Gross Domestic Product of over $2 trillion can seek a cheaper means of travelling, what is the Nigerian president, with a GDP of $300 billion, doing with a fleet of aircraft?

In 2010, a former British Prime Minister, David Cameron, saved his country a whopping £300,000 when he travelled on a commercial flight, business class, while on a state visit to the United States. For a man who was preaching fiscal austerity, there was no better way to walk the walk than what he did. A CNN report on the trip said the amount saved might not have been much for a country like Britain, with GDP of $2.84 trillion, but it sent out a message on the fiscal policy direction of the government.

As for some of the experts saying that the aircraft should form the nucleus of a prospective national carrier, the point should be made that, much as the country would welcome such an idea, it does not necessarily have to be floated or funded by the government. At a time when the government is being called upon to divest from business because government-run businesses are not run in a profitable manner, the last thing that anyone should urge the government to do is to get directly involved in a national carrier.

So, if the government wants Nigerians to sacrifice and be patient with its policies designed to pull the country out of the woods, the people should be able to see sincerity in government actions. There should be genuine efforts to cut costs in every aspect of governance. One of the ways to start it is by putting up most of the aircraft for sale.

Loss would be colossal waste of time, says Trump

 

Donald Trump cast the US presidential race in stark personal terms Wednesday, telling voters that if he loses against Hillary Clinton it will be the “single greatest waste” of his time and money.

The provocative billionaire, in a disjointed speech in Ocala, Florida with just 27 days before the election, reminded supporters that he will have spent some $100 million of his own fortune on his campaign.

“If I don’t win on November 8th, I will consider this the single greatest waste of time, of energy and money,” the Republican nominee told the crowd.

“We’ll not be able to reduce your taxes, or save your Second Amendment and appoint Supreme Court justices, and take care of your vets and fix up your very depleted” military, he said.

 

Trump trails his Democratic opponent Clinton in national polls, and his campaign is limping after last week’s release of a 2005 tape in which he is caught bragging about groping women.

He has since apologized for the comments, saying they were just “locker-room” banter.

Several fellow Republicans have abandoned him, and the nation’s top elected Republican is refusing to defend or campaign with Trump.

In Florida, Trump bashed Clinton as a criminal who has skirted punishment for her use of private email while secretary of state, which he said put America’s national security at risk.

“Other people’s lives have been ruined, destroyed for doing a tiny fraction” of what Clinton has done.

“I am ashamed of what has happened to our country and so are you,” he said.

With the race boiling down to three final weeks and Clinton in the driver’s seat, Trump appeared to be savaging his rival to keep her supporters or undecided voters away from the polls on Election Day.

“She pledged to dissolve the borders of the United States of America,” Trump fumed, referring to a hacked email, allegedly to a Clinton aide, that included quotes from her closed-door speeches to Wall Street banks and other corporations.

Clinton apparently told a Brazilian bank in 2013: “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, sometime in the future with energy that’s as green and sustainable as we can get it.”

The Democratic nominee was in Colorado on Wednesday, where her communications director criticized Trump’s “scorched-earth policy” aimed at driving down Democratic turnout.

“Obviously Hillary Clinton is very concerned about how divisive this race has been, and all that Donald Trump has done to try to divide Americans,” Jennifer Palmieri told reporters.

“We feel energy is growing on the Democratic side,” she said, citing growing Democratic voter registration in some key swing states.

Arms scam: FG converts Badeh’s N1.1bn mansion to office

A N1.1bn mansion seized from the immediate past Chief of Defence Staff, Air Chief Marshal Alex Badeh (retd.), has been converted to an office to be used by the Federal Government, The PUNCH has learnt.

Our correspondent, who visited the property located on Plot 6 Ogun River Crescent, Maitama, a highbrow area in Abuja, learnt that the property is being used by the Presidential Committee on the North-East Intervention headed by Lt.-Gen. Theophilus Danjuma, a former Minister of Defence.

Our correspondent observed that the warning, ‘EFCC, Keep Off!’ which was written in red ink on the fence, had been wiped off.

 

However, a second building (although uncompleted) seized from Badeh, which is located directly opposite the one converted by the Federal Government, still has the EFCC inscription on its fence.

Some gardeners and other domestic workers were seen clearing the grass and sweeping the compound when our correspondent visited the place.

Our reporter, who entered into the main building, noticed that the rooms had been converted into offices while desks had been set up at strategic positions.

When our correspondent approached one of the workers, he said, “The property was given to us by the government to work. I know that the EFCC seized the property some months ago but it was given to us to work.”

The EFCC is prosecuting Badeh alongside a firm, Iyalikam Nigeria Limited, on 10 counts of money laundering bordering on alleged fraudulent removal of about N3.97bn from the Nigerian Air Force account.

badehs-mansion2A former Director of Finance and Account of the Nigerian Air Force, Air Commodore Aliyu Yishau (retd.),who is a prosecution witness against Badeh, had informed the court that while Badeh was the Chief of Air Staff, he routinely helped Badeh to divert the sum of N558.2m by converting it to its dollar equivalent.

He said he personally helped Badeh to buy the N1.1bn property which has now been converted to Federal Government’s use.

He had said, “Sometime in January 2013, when I was taking the normal amount to him (Badeh) in dollars, he directed that we should pay for the house. So, he brought out the balance in dollars and made up the equivalent of N1.1bn.”

The EFCC lawyer, Mr. Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), had told the court that the EFCC searched the property and recovered $1m in cash.

Jacobs said although Badeh had denied ownership of the property, his belongings, including photographs, were found in it during a search by the operatives of the commission.

Our correspondent learnt that the decision to convert Badeh’s property may be connected to the Federal Government’s plan to convert seized properties to government use and save cost.

It will be recalled that the Minister of Finance, Kemi Adeosun, had disclosed at the opening of a meeting with the members of the National Steering Committee of the Efficiency Unit on June 10, 2016, that the Muhammadu Buhari-led government was planning to convert some of the seized properties to offices in a bid to save money spent on rent.

Seven banking services you can enjoy online

Internet banking, also called online banking, has become very popular in Nigeria. However, there are still many Nigerians who have the capacity to carry out Internet banking that are not doing so. This partly explains the reason for the long queues and crowd seen in the banking hall.

This causes a lot of inconveniences not only to bank workers but customers as well. There is a need for more people to embrace Internet banking and enjoy the full benefits it offers.

According to www.online-sciences.com, Internet banking refers to the banking services provided by the banks over the Internet. It is performed through a computer system or similar devices that can connect to the banking site via the Internet.

You can also carry out Internet banking on your mobile phones using a Wi-Fi or 3G connection.

There are only a few services banks do not render on their Internet banking platforms. These are often services that require physical presence of the customer at the banking hall. With the emergence of digital banking and financial technology phenomena, more banking services will continue to be rendered online. Banks will continue to push more of their products online.

While banks render a number of services on the Internet banking platform via the Automated Teller Machine, the beauty of Internet/online banking is that it provides more comfort. In the comfort of one’s home, Internet banking services can be enjoyed via the laptop, desktop or smartphones. Here are a few of the services banks render on the Internet banking platform.

Paying bills

Various kinds of bills including utility can be paid online. Taxes, digital or cable television subscription bills can be paid online, among other services

Funds transfer

This is perhaps the most common Internet banking service enjoyed by most customers. A larger percentage of customers who log on to the Internet banking platform do so to transfer funds. While  the ATM transfer is limited to N200,000 per day for most banks, millions of naira can be transferred from one bank account to another via Internet banking.

Viewing account statement

While the ATM allows the customer to view only account balances, a customer can view his or her account statement via the Internet banking platform.

Purchase of airtime, air ticket, etc

Commodities such as airtime and air tickets can be purchased via the Internet banking platform.

Opening of accounts

Customers can open a domiciliary or fixed deposit account on the Internet banking platform. This is possible because the bank already has some details of the customer in its custody.

Foreign exchange transactions

Certain foreign exchange transactions are also possible via the Internet banking platform.

Loan applications

Some banks allow customers to apply for loans through the Internet banking platform.

Other products

Other services will continue to be available online via the Internet banking platform. This is because banks are delivering or pushing their latest products and services over the Internet.


Declare state of emergency on kidnapping, Reps tell FG

 

The House of Representatives on Wednesday called on the Federal Government to declare a state of emergency on kidnapping in the country to curb the escalating cases of abduction, some resulting fatalities.

It said the police, the armed forces and telecommunication service providers should also convene a national security summit to find urgent solutions to the rising kidnapping incidents.

Aside identifying the harsh economic realities of today as a factor, members observed that criminals found kidnapping to be “more lucrative these days than armed robbery.”

 

A member from Ondo State, Mr. Babatunde Kolawole, had raised the issue on the floor under matters of urgent public importance to set a debate in motion.

Leading the debate on his motion, titled ‘The need for the Federal Government to declare a state of emergency on kidnapping in the country’, the All Progressives Congress lawmaker stated, “In the last 10 years, the incidence of kidnapping for ransom in the country has escalated to a very disturbing level and has reached a point where no one is safe anymore.”

He said available statistics indicated that in 2013, “Nigeria had the most kidnap attempts in the world, accounting for 26 per cent of all such recorded incidents, followed by Mexico with 10 per cent and Pakistan with seven per cent.”

Kolawole reeled out a list of major kidnapping incidents in the country.

He stated, “Former President Goodluck Jonathan’s foster father, 72-year-old Inengite Nitabai, who was kidnapped from his home in Otuoke in Bayelsa on Tuesday, February 16, 2016, was released in March after 35 days.

“A Kaduna State House of Assembly member, Ibrahim Ismail, was kidnapped on Tuesday, August 23 and released the next day. Margaret Emefiele, the wife of the Central Bank of Nigeria’s governor, Godwin Emefiele, was kidnapped on Thursday, September 29, 2016 and released on Saturday, October 1, 2016.

“Former Minister of Environment, Laurencia Mallam and her husband, Pius Mallam, were kidnapped along Bwari/Jere Road on Monday, October 3, 2016.

“A House of Representatives member from Katsina State, Mr. Sani Bello-Mashi, was also kidnapped alongside his aide at Goburawa village, Birnin Gwari area of Kaduna State on his way to his farm in August this year.”

The lawmaker added, “Before that, Mike Ozekhome, a human rights lawyer, in August, 2013; Archbishop Ignatius Kattey and his wife, September 6, 2013, in Port Harcourt, Rivers State; Mrs. Kamene Okonjo, mother of former Minister of Finance, Mrs. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, was kidnapped in 2013; Chief Olu Falae, a chieftain of the Social Democratic Party from Ondo State, was kidnapped in 2015 and thousands of other unreported cases because of people’s distrust in our security agencies.”

It’s usual to step on toes in graft war –FG

The Federal Government on Wednesday said it was not unusual to step on sensitive toes in its current fight against corruption.

The Minister of Information and Culture, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, said this in an interview with State House correspondents at the end of a meeting of the Federal Executive Council presided over by President Muhammadu Buhari at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

Mohammed was reacting to the outrage that had been trailing the recent arrests of judges and raids on their homes by officials of the Department of State Services.

While asking Nigerians to separate emotions from facts, the minister advised that the fight against corruption should not be mistaken for a fight against the judiciary.

He insisted that the arrests of the judges were carried out within the ambit of the law since they (the judges)did not have immunity against investigation and prosecution.

Mohammed said the fact that about 11 of the President’s ministers were lawyers out of which about five had Senior Advocates of Nigeria’s titles showed that Buhari had a lot of respect for the judiciary.

Mohammed added that the fact that the President took the cases of his three failed attempts to become the President before the judiciary also demonstrated that he had a lot of respect for that arm of government.

The minister said, “Do not confuse the fight against corruption as a fight against the judiciary. What the government is concerned and passionate about is to fight corruption.

“In the process of fighting corruption, it is not unusual that you step on some very sensitive toes but the question to ask and I think this has been adequately answered by the Attorney General is that let’s remove emotion from facts.

“One, do judges have immunity? The answer is no. Can judges be arrested? The answer is yes. Have judges that are serving been arrested in Nigeria? The answer is yes. Justice Okoli had been arrested and tried.

“Now, the next question to ask is, what is the proper procedure for arresting anybody including judges? There must be a properly acquired search warrant. Was such presented? The answer again is yes.

“People have tried to muddle the facts about when do you search the person’s house. The truth of the matter is that under the new criminal justice law, you can search anybody, anywhere, anytime.

“Again, they have tried to muddle issues by trying to say that the NJC is the only authority that can attend to complaints and discipline. The answer once again is no.

“When a judge is accused of professional misconduct is quite different from what is happening now. If you suspect anybody including governors who have immunity, they are still subject to investigations. So, I want to make it clear, this government has the highest respect for judiciary and we are not in any way trying to ridicule the judiciary.”


N’Assembly aides protest non-payment of salaries, allowances

Aides to senators and members of the House of Representatives on Wednesday protested the non-payment of their salaries and allowances.

The dramatic protest started about 10.15am after the angry aides stormed the main lobby of the National Assembly building.

They chanted songs and lamented the alleged maltreatment by both the management of their National Assembly and their immediate bosses.

 

“All we are saying, pay us our money, our salaries; Solidarity forever,” they chanted as they massed around the lobby.

The PUNCH observed that it took the intervention of the Sergeant-at-Arms, the police and other security personnel to diplomatically disperse the aides, but not before they had made their point that they were owed accumulated entitlements of about N1.5bn.

They alleged that the over 3,000 aides had not been paid allowances or attended any training in the last one year besides being owed salaries, making it difficult for them to feed, pay rent and settle other pressing bills.

The aides stated that they resorted to the protest after several meetings with the management and complaints to their bosses yielded no result.

They threatened that in their next outing, they would block the President of the Senate, Senator Bukola Saraki, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Mr. Yakubu Dogara, from entering the chambers to preside over proceedings if no actions were taken to address their plight.

One of the aides, Mr. Ucho Kingsley, described their situation as humiliating.

Kingsley stated that the aides were denied basic training.

He added, “Today is the 12th day of the month (October) and our salary has not been paid for last month.

“Our entitlements such as transport allowance for five quarters have not been paid to us.

“It is the same for our 28-day allowance, which has not been paid to most of us. We are entitled to training at least once each quarter but till date, we have never been sent for training.

“Nobody has come to address us; nobody has come to speak to us. When we ask questions, they give us excuses that the problem is from the management or another person.

“All we want is for our salaries to be paid on time; the same thing with our entitlements which we are being owed.”

The protesters chorused that they had met with the management for “at least 17 times” to ask questions but received no positive answers.

Another aide, Mr. Yusuf Modu, complained of discriminatory practices by the management.

He claimed that the management would sometimes pay the entitlements of the regular members of staff of the National Assembly but neglected them.

Modu added, “I don’t know why this discrimination exists despite the important role we play to senators and members of the House of Representatives.

“Today’s protest is to tell the management that enough is enough. The next time we storm this place, we will not allow the Speaker and the Senate President to enter the chambers until they address us.”

When The PUNCH sought the reaction of the management of the National Assembly, it said the payment of entitlements was tied to the release of funds.

The Director of Information and Publications, Mr. Dibal Ishaku-Adamu, told The PUNCH that the normal practice was that lawmakers and the aides were paid at the same time.

He explained that the lawmakers too were owed money because funds had yet to be released for payments to be processed.

Ishaku-Adamu stated, “Legislatives aides and members are paid together. They are paid the same time.

“So, if the members have not been paid, there is no way the aides will be paid because the money comes together.

“It is wrong for them to accuse the management of the National Assembly of withholding their money.”

The 2016 budget of the National Assembly and its organs, including the National Assembly Service Commission, is N115bn.

Ogun land grabbers risk 25 years jail or death

ogun state governor, ibikunle amosun

The Ogun State House of Assembly has passed a bill proposing 25 years imprisonment or death sentence for anyone found guilty of placing on any land or landed property any agent for the purpose of forceful takeover of the said land with arms or other offensive weapons.

According to the bill, death sentence applies when a life is or lives are lost in such forceful takeover of land. Kidnappers also risk life sentence.

The bill, which was passed into law on Tuesday, is currently awaiting the governor’s assent.

The bill equally spelt out N5m fine or 10 years imprisonment or both for anyone found guilty of placing on any land or landed property any agent for the purpose of forceful takeover of the said land.

The bill, which is  titled, “A bill for a law to prohibit forcible entry and occupation of landed properties, violent and fraudulent conducts in relation to landed properties,’ armed robbery, kidnapping, cultism and allied matters and for other matters incidental thereto or connected therewith.”

The bill was sponsored by the Deputy Speaker, Olakunle Taiwo Oluomo, representing Ifo 1 State constituency.


12 die as Shi’ite, youths clash in Katsina, Kaduna states

Bloody clashes erupted in Katsina and Kaduna states between the members of the Shi’ite Islamic sect and youths on Wednesday, leaving no fewer than 12 persons dead and several others injured.

 

It was gathered that despite being banned from staging public processions and rallies, the group staged processions in Katsina and Kaduna states to mark the sect’s Ashura Day and this sparked off protests by angry youths in the two states.

In Katsina, the clash erupted in Funtua as early as 8am, as the members of the group and youths engaged in a bloody free-for-all.

No fewer than 10 persons were killed in the Funtua clash, which saw many houses and vehicles vandalised.

Katsina State Police Commissioner, Abubakar Mohammed, personally led his officers and men to the scene of the clash in Funtua.

Funtua is a commercial hub in Katsina State.

The Police Public Relations Officer, Katsina Command, DSP Salisu Agasia, confirmed the incident but denied knowledge of any casualty.

“All I can tell you for now is that my commissioner is in Funtua, leading the operation and we are on top of the situation,” Agasia said.

Not a few youths in the state were opposed to the teachings of the group, which they consider as extreme.

It could not be established who first drew blood between the members of the group and the youths even as another account of the clash said that it was police operatives that clashed with the members of the group.

The latter account said that it was not youths that clashed with the members of the sect.

Speaking on the telephone, a resident of Funtua said, “There is still booming of guns and property are being vandalised while we are now held up in our various houses. It is not an ethnic clash. The clash is between the Shi’ite members and other Muslims, who are opposed to their methods of preaching. The police are also on the streets but we cannot go out because of fear of attack.”

A commercial driver plying the Katsina-Kaduna-Issa-Lawan Road said he was already a few kilometres to Funtua on Wednesday morning when he was advised against driving through the city because of the incident.

The driver said he avoided the Katsina-Kaduna-Issa-Lawan Road and took the Old Sabwa Road instead.

Commercial activities in the city were paralysed while security operatives stationed their vehicles at strategic areas of Funtua.

In Kaduna, confusion enveloped the Zango area, where angry youths and the Shi’ite members clashed.

 Zango is in the Tudun-Wada area of Kaduna-South. It is one of the flashpoints in the state.

It was gathered that two members of the Shi’ite group were killed during the clash.

A source, who did not want his name in print, said trouble started at about 7am when the members of the Islamic group, despite being outlawed in the state, embarked on a procession to mark their Ashura Day.

It was gathered that a team of the state security outfit, ‘Operation Yaki’, dispersed them.

No sooner had the security agents left than the sect’s members allegedly regrouped and descended on the residents, whom they viewed as ‘collaborators’ with the security operatives.

“The youths mobilised against the Shi’ite group,” said an eyewitness, Nura Ibrahim.

Nura said the encounter led to a free-for-all which witnessed the death of two members of the sect.

Also, another eyewitness, who simply called himself Yahaya, said the angry youths mobilised to set the residence of the Kaduna leader of the Shi’ite group, Mallam Mukhtar Sahabi, ablaze.

But a Shi’ite member, Ibrahim Ardo, however, alleged that the youths were sponsored by the state government.

He said the members of the group had been living peacefully within the community until the government incited the youths against them.

The Kaduna Police Command confirmed the incident.

The Police Public Relation Officer, Kaduna Command, Aliyu Usman, said there were some skirmishes between the youths in the Zango area of the state, adding that no life was lost in the clash.

Meanwhile, a combined team of soldiers and riot policemen on Wednesday swooped on the house of the Shi’ite leader in Jos, Alhaji Adamu Tsoho,  and demolished the sect’s Husaniyya (worship centre).

Some members of the sect were said to be gathering at their worship centre located at Angwan Rogo, in the Jos-North Local Government Area of the state when security operatives allegedly swooped on them.

A member of the group, Saifullahi Mohammed, who spoke to one of our correspondents, said that the incident happened at about 10am.

The Police Public Relations Officer, Plateau State Command, ASP Terna Tyopev, and the Media Officer of Operation Safe Haven, Capt. Ikedichi Iweha, could not be reached for  comments on the incidents.